◷Pre-launch preview · example data · Methodology
△ Futures
Earn2Trade vs TradeDay: Which Futures Eval Is Cheaper?
Earn2Trade is cheaper in the first month at 50K: $47.40 vs $171.30 with our codes. Earn2Trade gives more room per dollar of target (PT:DD 1:0.83). On Trustpilot, TradeDay scores higher (4.6 from 2,310 reviews), which is Trustpilot’s data, not ours. Earn2Trade uses eod trailing drawdown with a 100% split and no activation fee; TradeDay uses intraday trailing drawdown with a 100% split and a $130 activation fee.
Futures firms only
Compare at◆ marks the better value for traders
E Earn2TradeTrader Career Path · $50K Visit Earn2Trade | T TradeDayIntraday · $50K Visit TradeDay | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||
| Price with code | $47.40one-time | ◆$41.30monthly | |
| Original price | $79.00 | $59.00 | |
| First month | ◆$47.40 | $171.30incl. activation | |
| Activation fee | ◆$0 | $130 | |
| Reset | $49.00 | ◆$29.00 | |
| Rules | |||
| Plan | Trader Career Path · 2-step | Intraday · 1-step | |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $2,500 | |
| Daily loss | ◆None | $1,100 | |
| Max loss | ◆$2,500 | $2,000 | |
| Drawdown | EOD trailing | Intraday trailing | |
| PT:DD | ◆1:0.83 | 1:0.80 | |
| Max contracts | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | |
| Consistency | None | 20% | 40% | 20% | |
| Payouts | |||
| Profit split | 100% | 100% | |
| Frequency | Every 14 days, min $100 | Weekly after 5 trading days | |
| Min payout | ◆$250 | $500 | |
| Platforms | |||
| Platforms | NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Finamark | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, Quantower, TradingView | |
| Reputation | |||
| TrustScore (Trustpilot) | 4.5 | ◆4.6 | |
| Trustpilot reviews | ◆3,880 | 2,310 | |
| Years operating | ◆10 yr | 6 yr | |
| Headquarters | US | US | |
Which one fits you?
Pick Earn2Trade if you want the lower first-month cost ($47.40), more room per dollar of target (PT:DD 1:0.83), no activation fee, an eod trailing drawdown, Finamark and the bigger code (40% off).
Pick TradeDay if you want an intraday trailing drawdown and Tradovate, Quantower and TradingView.
More comparisons